<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Cradlepoint announces 3G-ready CTR500 travel router]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/cradlepoint-announces-3g-ready-ctr500-travel-router/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/cradlepoint-announces-3g-ready-ctr500-travel-router/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/cradlepoint-announces-3g-ready-ctr500-travel-router/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/wireless/" rel="tag">Wireless</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><div align="center"><a href="http://www.cradlepoint.com/ctr500/ctr500.php"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/05/cradlepoint-ctr500.jpg" /></a>
<div align="left">It's been a while since we've heard anything from the mobile-friendly folks at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/cradlepoint">Cradlepoint</a>, but it looks like they've hit all the right marks with their new 3G-ready CTR500 travel router, which takes all the features of the previous <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/07/cradlepoint-busts-out-ctr-350-cellular-travel-router/">CTR-350</a> model and adds a few welcome additions. The biggest of those is an ExpressCard slot, which complements the existing USB port to accommodate whatever 3G modem or 3G-capable cellphone you might have. You'll also, of course, get a 10/100 Ethernet port, and full 802.11b/g compliance, along with support for an external 802.11 antenna (sold separately) if you need a bit more range. If that sounds like the upgrade you've been waiting for, you can get your order in now for $180, although the routers apparently won't start shipping until June 1st.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/08/05/15/cradlepoint.ctr500.router/">Electronista</a>]<br /> </div>
</div><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cradlepoint.com/ctr500/ctr500.php>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/cradlepoint-announces-3g-ready-ctr500-travel-router/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1196563/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/cradlepoint-announces-3g-ready-ctr500-travel-router/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3g</category><category>3g router</category><category>3g-ready router</category><category>3g-readyRouter</category><category>3gRouter</category><category>cradlepoint</category><category>ctr500</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 14:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Electricity-powered Datastorm data transfer device is retrolutionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/12/electricity-powered-datastorm-data-transfer-device-is-retrolutio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/12/electricity-powered-datastorm-data-transfer-device-is-retrolutio/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/12/electricity-powered-datastorm-data-transfer-device-is-retrolutio/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/wireless/" rel="tag">Wireless</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><div align="center"><a href="http://revver.com/video/874984/datastorm-v10/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/05/datastorm-1.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Face it, that sneakernet setup of yours is way tired. What you need is a racist wireless data transfer device that fires 3.5-inch floppy disks at deadly velocity. Really, you've earned it. Video after the break.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/12/electricity-powered-datastorm-data-transfer-device-is-retrolutio/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Electricity-powered Datastorm data transfer device is retrolutionary</em></a></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://revver.com/video/874984/datastorm-v10/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/12/electricity-powered-datastorm-data-transfer-device-is-retrolutio/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1192748/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/12/electricity-powered-datastorm-data-transfer-device-is-retrolutio/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>datastorm</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 08:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Philadelphia's citywide WiFi close to shutting down]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/10/philadelphias-citywide-wifi-close-to-shutting-down/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/10/philadelphias-citywide-wifi-close-to-shutting-down/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/10/philadelphias-citywide-wifi-close-to-shutting-down/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><div align="center"><a href="http://philly.metro.us/metro/local/article/Citywide_WiFi_could_be_shut_down/12422.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/05/5-10-08-philly-skyline.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
It'd be absolutely spectacular to actually see one of these admittedly <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/28/atandt-scales-back-citywide-wifi-agenda-in-st-louis/">ambitious</a> municipal WiFi projects actually work out every now and then, but instead, we're seeing the nails start to sink into <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/30/san-francisco-muni-wifi-project-on-death-bed/">yet another</a> citywide WiFi coffin. This go 'round, the network <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2004/09/01/philadelphia-the-biggest-wifi-hotspot-in-the-world/">blanketing</a> most of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/05/12/city-council-unanimously-approves-philly-wifi/">Philadelphia, Pennsylvania</a> is on the verge of sending out its last signals unless the city can devise a plan in short order to take it over from EarthLink, who <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/08/earthlink-puts-municipal-wifi-business-up-for-sale/">unsurprisingly</a> wants <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/06/earthlink-scores-philly-wifi/">out</a> on the double. Unfortunately, we don't have a great feeling about the system's future -- history has a way of forecasting, you know?<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9940374-7.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20">CNET</a>, image courtesy of <a href="http://stippling.org/albums/Philadelphia/Philadelphia_Skyline.jpg">Stippling</a>]<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://philly.metro.us/metro/local/article/Citywide_WiFi_could_be_shut_down/12422.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/10/philadelphias-citywide-wifi-close-to-shutting-down/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1192030/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/10/philadelphias-citywide-wifi-close-to-shutting-down/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>internet</category><category>muni wifi</category><category>muni-fi</category><category>municipal wifi</category><category>MunicipalWifi</category><category>MuniWifi</category><category>pennsylvania</category><category>Philadelphia</category><category>rip</category><category>shut down</category><category>ShutDown</category><category>wifi</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 23:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DARPA aims to create virtual environment for cyberwar simulations]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/09/darpa-aims-to-create-virtual-environment-for-cyberwar-simulation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/09/darpa-aims-to-create-virtual-environment-for-cyberwar-simulation/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/09/darpa-aims-to-create-virtual-environment-for-cyberwar-simulation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><div align="center"><a href="http://www.darkgovernment.com/news/darpa-national-cyber-range/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/05/5-9-08-hackers-simulation.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Considering that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/05/18/india-announces-plans-to-develop-robot-army/">mechanical beings</a> will be fighting our real wars <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/31/irobot-announces-sentinel-robot-army-project/">here</a> in just a few <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2005/02/17/the-robot-army-of-the-future/">years</a>, it's no shock to see more focus placed on the areas where actual humans will still be the ones waging. DARPA is looking to create what it calls a National Cyber Range, which would essentially act as a training ground for cyber warriors. The setup would enable defense gurus to simulate battle against attacks our on nation's most highly prized data, and of course, give victors over virtual phishing scams immense bragging rights. Come to think of it, Estonia could have <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/estonia-networks-slammed-by-possible-russian-cyber-attacks/">totally benefited</a> from something like this last year.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/personal_tech/virtualworlds/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=207601201">Information Week</a>, image courtesy of <a href="http://www.sandia.gov/news/publications/technology/2006/0804/images/richardson-henry.jpg">Sandia</a>]<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.darkgovernment.com/news/darpa-national-cyber-range/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/09/darpa-aims-to-create-virtual-environment-for-cyberwar-simulation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1191189/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/09/darpa-aims-to-create-virtual-environment-for-cyberwar-simulation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cyber threat</category><category>CyberThreat</category><category>cyberwar</category><category>darpa</category><category>hacker</category><category>hackers</category><category>military</category><category>national cyber range</category><category>NationalCyberRange</category><category>security</category><category>simulation</category><category>simulator</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 17:43:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Vonage to resell Covad DSL, call it Vonage Broadband]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/08/vonage-to-resell-covad-dsl-call-it-vonage-broadband/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/08/vonage-to-resell-covad-dsl-call-it-vonage-broadband/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/08/vonage-to-resell-covad-dsl-call-it-vonage-broadband/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><div align="center"><a href="http://sev.prnewswire.com/telecommunications/20080508/NYTH08208052008-1.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/05/5-8-08-vonage-covad.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
After a good bit of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/vonage-nortel-call-a-truce-no-cash-changing-hands/">hand-shaking</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/17/vonage-loses-appeal-now-owes-verizon-117-5-million/">check-writing</a> to close out last year, Vonage has managed to remain out of the press for the majority of 2008. Now, however, the firm is sneaking back out from its cocoon in order to announce a partnership with Covad Communications. In essence, it seems that Vonage has inked an agreement to resell broadband packages using Covad's nationwide DSL network. Jeffrey Citron, Chairman, Chief Strategist, and Interim CEO even went so far as to say that the newly coined Vonage Broadband would enable the firm to "respond to the demand it hears from customers who prefer the Vonage brand." Really? You've got folks who <em>prefer</em> the Vonage brand? Maybe we <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/20/atandt-slaps-vonage-with-yet-another-lawsuit/">missed</a> the comeback.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://sev.prnewswire.com/telecommunications/20080508/NYTH08208052008-1.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/08/vonage-to-resell-covad-dsl-call-it-vonage-broadband/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1190047/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/08/vonage-to-resell-covad-dsl-call-it-vonage-broadband/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>agreement</category><category>covad</category><category>dsl</category><category>internet</category><category>partner</category><category>partnership</category><category>reselling</category><category>vonage</category><category>Vonage Broadband</category><category>VonageBroadband</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 11:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AT&amp;T WiFi hotspots free to iPhone owners, anyone with a brain]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/01/atandt-wifi-hotspots-free-to-iphone-owners-anyone-with-a-brain/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/01/atandt-wifi-hotspots-free-to-iphone-owners-anyone-with-a-brain/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/01/atandt-wifi-hotspots-free-to-iphone-owners-anyone-with-a-brain/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/05/att_wifi.jpg" /><br /></div>
Now that AT&amp;T has <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/11/starbucks-brews-up-wifi-relationship-with-atandt-tosses-t-mobile/">full control</a> of wireless hotspots like <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/25/atandt-and-starbucks-begin-wifi-rollout/">Starbucks</a> and Barnes and Nobles, it looks like they're doling out freebies to their favorite customers: iPhone users. Apparently, if you've got one of Apple's devices, you can hop on the WiFi networks for exactly zero dollars provided you enter your phone number at a login screen. Great for iPhone owners, but a raw deal for everyone else, right? Not so fast, apparently a dumb hack gets you the service on the house too -- just switch your browser's user agent to Mobile Safari, and presto! Free internet. We can't imagine this is a hole that won't get plugged real fast, so get it while the gettin's good.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2008/05/01/atandt-offers-free-wifi-for-iphone-users/">TUAW</a>]<br /><br /><a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2008/04/30/free-atandt-wi-fi-access-for-iphones/">Read</a> - AT&amp;T Providing Free Wi-Fi Access to iPhone Users<br /><a href="http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?p=5384169#post5384169">Read</a> - Hotspot hack<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/01/atandt-wifi-hotspots-free-to-iphone-owners-anyone-with-a-brain/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1183156/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/01/atandt-wifi-hotspots-free-to-iphone-owners-anyone-with-a-brain/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>att</category><category>barnes and noble</category><category>BarnesAndNoble</category><category>hotspot</category><category>iphone</category><category>starbucks</category><category>wifi</category><category>wireless</category><category>wireless hotspot</category><category>WirelessHotspot</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Topolsky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 10:07:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner plans to spin off Time Warner Cable at long last]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/30/time-warner-plans-to-spin-off-time-warner-cable-at-long-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/30/time-warner-plans-to-spin-off-time-warner-cable-at-long-last/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/30/time-warner-plans-to-spin-off-time-warner-cable-at-long-last/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/hdtv/" rel="tag">HDTV</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/homeentertainment/" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/30/business/30warner-web.html?_r=2&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin"><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="16" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/04/time-warner-cable-logo.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/TimeWarnerCable/">Time Warner Cable</a>, which just endeared itself to New Yorkers with <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/04/29/twcs-new-york-new-jersey-hd-explosion-seen-a-bit-early/">a whole mess of HD channels</a>, is finally getting a full break from parent company and all-around media conglomerate <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/TimeWarner/">Time Warner</a>. This has been speculated about for years, and a portion of TWC was spun off into Bright House Networks in 2003, but the clean break should give both companies a good shot at doing what they both do best: raking in obscene amounts of cash. There's no word on the timeline or method for the spin off just yet, only a promise to finalize an agreement "soon." [<em>Disclosure: Engadget is part of the Time Warner family</em>]<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/30/business/30warner-web.html?_r=2&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/30/time-warner-plans-to-spin-off-time-warner-cable-at-long-last/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1181781/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/30/time-warner-plans-to-spin-off-time-warner-cable-at-long-last/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>time warner</category><category>time warner cable</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Netgear offers up 6-bay ReadyNAS Pro]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/29/netgear-offers-up-6-bay-readynas-pro/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/29/netgear-offers-up-6-bay-readynas-pro/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/29/netgear-offers-up-6-bay-readynas-pro/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/storage/" rel="tag">Storage</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><div align="center"><a href="http://www.netgear.com/About/PressReleases/en-US/2008/20080428b.aspx"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/04/4-28-08-rnd6000.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Four months is just too long to go without an all new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/netgear-launches-readynas-duo-storage-lineup/">ReadyNAS</a>, so we suppose that's why Netgear is kicking out an all new 6-bay unit (6TB RNDP6610; 3TB RNDP6310; 1.5TB RNDP6350) for those obsessed with storage. The box can handle up to 6TB of HDD space and features an Intel Core 2 Duo processor, 1GB of DDR2 RAM (up to 4GB supported), 128MB of embedded flash for the OS, a pair of gigabit Ethernet ports, three USB 2.0 sockets and support for RAID 0/1/5/6 and Auto-Expandable X-RAID2. As expected, Windows / Mac / Linux clients can all tap in, and the unit streams all sorts of media on the side. Of course, acquiring the industry's first 6-bay small-form-factor NAS drive won't come cheap, with the ReadyNAS Pro starting at around two large.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.netgear.com/About/PressReleases/en-US/2008/20080428b.aspx>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/29/netgear-offers-up-6-bay-readynas-pro/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1180148/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/29/netgear-offers-up-6-bay-readynas-pro/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>nas</category><category>Netgear</category><category>readynas</category><category>readynas pro</category><category>ReadynasPro</category><category>RNDP6350</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[White space networking could disrupt hospital telemetry systems]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/28/white-space-networking-could-disrupt-hospital-telemetry-systems/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/28/white-space-networking-could-disrupt-hospital-telemetry-systems/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/28/white-space-networking-could-disrupt-hospital-telemetry-systems/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/wireless/" rel="tag">Wireless</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><div align="center"><a href="http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9930441-7.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1040_3-0-10"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/04/4-28-2008-whitespace.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
The <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/30/yet-another-microsoft-white-space-device-fails-fcc-testing/">stumbling blocks</a> keep piling up as white space networking struggles to get off the ground: it looks like the manufacturers of healthcare equipment are set to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/nab-takes-on-microsoft-google-with-anti-white-space-internet-ad/">join NAB</a> in opposing the technology. Wireless medical telemetry devices like heart monitors have been operating in broadcast white spaces since the late 80s, and manufacturers like GE Healthcare say that the Microsoft- and Google-backed white space networking initiative could potentially "directly interfere" and "prevent patient monitoring." For its part, the FCC has set aside all of channel 37 for medical telemetry devices in 1998 after interference from a nearby TV station shut down the system at Baylor University Medical Center, but it wasn't mandatory, and hospitals that haven't made the switch could face millions of dollars in upgrade costs. That's not say that medical telemetry concerns are a problem that can't be solved -- the new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/24/google-pushes-the-fcc-for-white-space-access-will-offer-free-re/">Google push</a> includes a channel 37 exception, for example, and there are some other compromise solutions on the table -- but it seems like there's no end of issues for a technology that hasn't really even been <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/12/white-space-tests-fail-again-next-up-conquering-windmills/">demonstrated</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/07/fcc-chimes-in-on-white-space-device-from-google-microsoft-and/">working</a> yet.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9930441-7.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1040_3-0-10>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/28/white-space-networking-could-disrupt-hospital-telemetry-systems/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1180146/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/28/white-space-networking-could-disrupt-hospital-telemetry-systems/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ge healthcare</category><category>GeHealthcare</category><category>healthcare</category><category>hospital</category><category>hospitals</category><category>medical telemetry</category><category>MedicalTelemetry</category><category>white space</category><category>white space internet</category><category>white space networking</category><category>WhiteSpace</category><category>WhiteSpaceInternet</category><category>WhiteSpaceNetworking</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[FCC's broadband over power lines expansion hits major snag]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/28/fccs-broadband-over-power-lines-expansion-hits-major-snag/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/28/fccs-broadband-over-power-lines-expansion-hits-major-snag/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/28/fccs-broadband-over-power-lines-expansion-hits-major-snag/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><a href="http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9930223-7.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1040_3-0-10"><img vspace="14" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Powerline Modem" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/04/powerline_modem.jpg" /></a>If you're waiting for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=broadband+over+power+lines">broadband over power lines</a> (BPL) as an alternative to cable or DSL in your area, it may be time to finally give in to one of the big companies. The American Radio Relay League (ARRL) -- a group of amateur radio enthusiasts -- has sued the FCC over its plan to speed up BPL's expansion, citing concerns that the service's radio emissions provide too many interference risks to the hobby / ham spectrum. While the FCC conducted a favorable study on BPL's potential problems, their published report had so many redacted sections that the ARRL wants to know what they missed. A D.C. district court agrees with the League, and plans for further rollout have been tabled until the FCC can come up with more facts.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9930223-7.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1040_3-0-10>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/28/fccs-broadband-over-power-lines-expansion-hits-major-snag/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1179910/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/28/fccs-broadband-over-power-lines-expansion-hits-major-snag/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>arrl</category><category>bpl</category><category>broadband</category><category>fcc</category><category>powerline</category><category>powerline networking</category><category>PowerlineNetworking</category><category>powerlines</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Fruhlinger]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comcast tells AT&amp;T to lay off its coax, seeks restraining order]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/24/comcast-tells-atandt-to-lay-off-its-coax-seeks-restraining-order/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/24/comcast-tells-atandt-to-lay-off-its-coax-seeks-restraining-order/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/24/comcast-tells-atandt-to-lay-off-its-coax-seeks-restraining-order/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080423-comcast-atts-u-verse-is-messing-with-our-network.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/04/4-22-08-comcast.jpg" alt="" /></a>Never one shy to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/14/comcast-sues-fcc-for-not-letting-it-own-anything-it-wants/">pick</a> a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/21/comcast-to-nfl-network-stop-coaxing-customers-away-or-else/">fight</a>, Comcast is now taking square aim at AT&amp;T, which it alleges is wreaking havoc with its internet service as a result of shoddy installs of the company's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/u-verse">U-verse</a> TV service. More specifically, as Ars Technica points out, while both companies use different lines outside of the home (copper coax for Comcast and twisted pair for AT&amp;T), they each use the same coaxial wiring inside the house, which Comcast says causes "feedback" to leak back out onto its network, possibly as a result of the two services using similar frequencies or filters. That, Comcast says, has caused service disruptions for some 20,000 users in the Chicago area, with it particularly affecting those that mix and match Comcast and U-verse services. To put a stop to that, Comcast is now seeking a restraining order against AT&amp;T, although it apparently hasn't received one as of yet. For its part, AT&amp;T not only unsurprisingly says that "the suit lacks merit and that the company intends to vigorously fight it," but that it plans to significantly ramp up the roll out of U-verse in Illinois.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.showArticleHomePage&amp;art_aid=81307">Online Media Daily</a>, thanks Alan M]<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080423-comcast-atts-u-verse-is-messing-with-our-network.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/24/comcast-tells-atandt-to-lay-off-its-coax-seeks-restraining-order/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1176885/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/24/comcast-tells-atandt-to-lay-off-its-coax-seeks-restraining-order/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>-uverse</category><category>att</category><category>comcast</category><category>restraining order</category><category>RestrainingOrder</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[QNAP delivers BitTorrent-lovin' TS-109 Pro II and TS-209 Pro II NAS drives]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/24/qnap-delivers-bittorrent-lovin-ts-109pro-ii-and-ts-209-pro-ii-na/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/24/qnap-delivers-bittorrent-lovin-ts-109pro-ii-and-ts-209-pro-ii-na/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/24/qnap-delivers-bittorrent-lovin-ts-109pro-ii-and-ts-209-pro-ii-na/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/storage/" rel="tag">Storage</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><div align="center"><a href="http://www.qnap.com/PressRelease_detail.asp?pr_id=84"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/04/4-24-08-ts-209-front.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
QNAP's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/08/qnaps-latest-bittorrent-nas-ts-109-pro-turbo-station/">TS-109</a> / <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/03/qnap-intros-well-specd-ts-209-nas-server/">TS-209</a> NAS drives weren't anything to sneeze at, but the company's looking to improve overall responsiveness and speed up BitTorrent download performance with a pair of successors. The one-bay TS-109 Pro II and two-bay TS-209 Pro II both include a potent 500MHz Marvell processor and 256MB of DDR2 RAM, which is double the memory stuffed within the prior iterations. You'll also find a new and improved BT engine that promises "the [same] level of P2P download speed as PC-based BT downloads," built-in Joomla! CMS 1.5.1, scheduled backup / logging applications, DivX-friendly TwonkyMedia v4.4.4 and support for DLNA / NFS / SMB multimedia sharing. Sorry, no pricing deets to share at the moment.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.qnap.com/PressRelease_detail.asp?pr_id=84>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/24/qnap-delivers-bittorrent-lovin-ts-109pro-ii-and-ts-209-pro-ii-na/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1176574/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/24/qnap-delivers-bittorrent-lovin-ts-109pro-ii-and-ts-209-pro-ii-na/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BitTorrent</category><category>NAS</category><category>P2P</category><category>qnap</category><category>TS-109</category><category>TS-109 Pro</category><category>TS-109 Pro II</category><category>Ts-109Pro</category><category>Ts-109ProIi</category><category>TS-209</category><category>TS-209 Pro II</category><category>Ts-209ProIi</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 14:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AT&amp;T slashing 1.5 percent of workforce]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/atandt-slashing-1-5-percent-of-workforce/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/atandt-slashing-1-5-percent-of-workforce/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/atandt-slashing-1-5-percent-of-workforce/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/wireless/" rel="tag">Wireless</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><div align="center"><a href="http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9922286-7.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1040_3-0-10"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/04/att-dt.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Facing down a "sluggish" economy and in light of some recent regional acquisitions, AT&amp;T announced today that it'll be cutting about 1.5 percent of its workforce, primarily concentrating on management. The company calls it the "next step in streamlining its operations," and will shelling out about $375 million in Q1 to make the layoffs happen. According to some dubious maths perpetrated by the Engadget staff, 1.5 percent of AT&amp;T's workforce is about 4,635.75 humans, not a minuscule cut by a long shot. We'd certainly hate to be in Mr. 75 percent's shoes right now.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9922286-7.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1040_3-0-10>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/atandt-slashing-1-5-percent-of-workforce/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1171335/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/atandt-slashing-1-5-percent-of-workforce/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>att</category><category>layoffs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 10:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Screen Grabs: giant Linksys WiFi router is The Internet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/17/screen-grabs-giant-linksys-wifi-router-is-the-internet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/17/screen-grabs-giant-linksys-wifi-router-is-the-internet/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/17/screen-grabs-giant-linksys-wifi-router-is-the-internet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><em>Screen grabs chronicles the uses (and misuses) of real-world gadgets in today's movies and TV. Send in your sightings (with screen grab!) to screengrabs at engadget dt com.</em><br /><br />
<div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/04/screen-grabs-linksys-internet.jpg" alt="" /><br /></div>
Complete internet downtime is no laughing matter, but more frightening still is the prospect that the world's data flow is completely beheld to a giant, taciturn Linksys WiFi router. South Park clip embedded after the break -- we're still trying to decide whether this trumps the Aqua Teen episode where they meet the <a href="http://www.yzzerdd.com/">Wwwyzzerdd</a>, freakish master of the internet.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/17/screen-grabs-giant-linksys-wifi-router-is-the-internet/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Screen Grabs: giant Linksys WiFi router is The Internet</em></a></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/17/screen-grabs-giant-linksys-wifi-router-is-the-internet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1171014/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/17/screen-grabs-giant-linksys-wifi-router-is-the-internet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>internet</category><category>linksys</category><category>screen grabs</category><category>ScreenGrabs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Block]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 23:18:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Caption contest: WiMAX hits store shelves in Bosnia]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/17/caption-contest-wimax-hits-store-shelves-in-bosnia/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/17/caption-contest-wimax-hits-store-shelves-in-bosnia/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/17/caption-contest-wimax-hits-store-shelves-in-bosnia/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/04/wimax_in_bosnia.jpg" alt="" /><br /></div>
Sometimes, you want more than just wide-area broadband. Sometimes you want the downy softness that only "WiMAX" can bring. We're not totally sure what this is, but we're almost positive it will not deliver speedy downloads and near-limitless connectivity.<br /><br /><strong>Paul:</strong> "Sprint's brilliant plan for rolling out WiMAX coverage on the cheap only had one fatal flaw..."<br /><strong>Chris: </strong>"Considered key to XOHM's success, Sprint's first stab at a steampunk Hello Kitty WiMAX router yields mixed results."<br /><strong>Josh T: </strong>"WiMAX: use color-safe bleach only, tumble dry."<br /><strong>Josh F: </strong>"For those lighter 2-bar days."<br /><strong>Ittousai:</strong> "WE DEMAND MORE PAMUK!"<br /><strong>Nilay:</strong> "17.45 for WiMAX? Outrageous!"<br /><strong>Dante:</strong> "Suddenly, that failed Australian WiMAX rollout, makes much more sense..."<br /><strong>Richard:</strong> "Because really, who buys their WiMAX off the rack?"<br /><br />[Thanks, Srle]<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/17/caption-contest-wimax-hits-store-shelves-in-bosnia/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1170849/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/17/caption-contest-wimax-hits-store-shelves-in-bosnia/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>caption contest</category><category>CaptionContest</category><category>wimax</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Topolsky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[UAE nabbed a pair of ships suspected for undersea cable cutting]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/14/uae-nabbed-a-pair-of-ships-suspected-for-undersea-cable-cutting/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/14/uae-nabbed-a-pair-of-ships-suspected-for-undersea-cable-cutting/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/14/uae-nabbed-a-pair-of-ships-suspected-for-undersea-cable-cutting/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><a href="http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Infotech/Internet_/UAE_releases_one_of_the_ships_impounded_for_cable_damage/articleshow/2947325.cms"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/04/cable-guy-uae.jpg"  alt="" /></a>Turns out the United Arab Emirates took two ships into custody on February 19th after those <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/06/cut-four-undersea-cables-shame-on-you-cut-a-fifth-also-shame/">infamous cable cuttings</a>. Wayward anchors are suspected to be at fault, and the Korean company responsible for one of the vessels just agreed to fork over 60 grand in damages in exchange for the release of its ship. The other ship, which is owned by an Iraqi company, is still under Dubai custody, and the two sailors on board were arrested and are awaiting prosecution next week. As for us, we're standing by our space aliens in league with garden gnomes theory. It all just adds up.<br /> <br /> [Thanks, Mike]<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Infotech/Internet_/UAE_releases_one_of_the_ships_impounded_for_cable_damage/articleshow/2947325.cms>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/14/uae-nabbed-a-pair-of-ships-suspected-for-undersea-cable-cutting/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1166520/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/14/uae-nabbed-a-pair-of-ships-suspected-for-undersea-cable-cutting/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>uae</category><category>undersea cable</category><category>UnderseaCable</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Researcher creates malicious, router-controlling website]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/08/researcher-creates-malicious-router-controlling-website/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/08/researcher-creates-malicious-router-controlling-website/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/08/researcher-creates-malicious-router-controlling-website/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><div align="center"><a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,144224-pg,1/article.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/04/router_hack.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Like having control of your connection to the internet? Don't tell Dan Kaminsky that -- the researcher has developed a method of DNS attack utilizing typical D-Link or Linksys routers that can allow hackers to gain command of your gear. The winner-takes-all maneuver, which is called a "DNS rebinding attack," functions by putting JavaScript into play that fools your browser into altering your router's configuration, thus letting the operator remotely administer the device. The concept isn't water-tight, as it takes advantage of easily-guessable router admin passwords, though Kaminsky says the enabling bug exists as a "core issue" for browsers. The attack will be showcased at tomorrow's RSA security conference, where it's hoped the demonstration will raise awareness about router security vulnerability. In the meantime, we suggest you change that default password.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,144224-pg,1/article.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/08/researcher-creates-malicious-router-controlling-website/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1161187/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/08/researcher-creates-malicious-router-controlling-website/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bug</category><category>crack</category><category>dan kaminsky</category><category>DanKaminsky</category><category>hack</category><category>malicious code</category><category>MaliciousCode</category><category>router</category><category>rsa security conference</category><category>RsaSecurityConference</category><category>security</category><category>website</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Topolsky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 01:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple says AirPort Disk use with Time Machine is unsupported]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/07/apple-says-airport-disk-use-with-time-machine-is-unsupported/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/07/apple-says-airport-disk-use-with-time-machine-is-unsupported/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/07/apple-says-airport-disk-use-with-time-machine-is-unsupported/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/storage/" rel="tag">Storage</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><div align="center"><a href="http://db.tidbits.com/article/9547"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/04/4-7-08-airport.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Okay, the Time Machine / AirPort Extreme situation is now officially ridiculous. TidBITS's Glenn Fleishmann says Apple's confirmed to him that the Extreme is unsupported for use with Time Machine, even though the latest batch of updates <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/time-machine-now-works-with-airport-extremes-airdisk-feature/">enable AirPort Disks to show up</a> in the Time Machine disk-selection box. Fleishmann thinks a it's leftover developer testing glitch, but either way, Apple's will-they-won't-they routine means lots of people now have an unsupported backup solution that works "erratically." Seriously, if you thought AirPort Extreme owners were <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/21/airport-extreme-owners-not-happy-to-be-left-out-of-time-capsule/">pissed off about Time Capsule</a>, just wait until backups start failing. Not a lot of options left, Apple -- better get this feature up and running ASAP.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://db.tidbits.com/article/9547>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/07/apple-says-airport-disk-use-with-time-machine-is-unsupported/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1161100/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/07/apple-says-airport-disk-use-with-time-machine-is-unsupported/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airport</category><category>airport disk</category><category>airport extreme</category><category>AirportDisk</category><category>AirportExtreme</category><category>apple</category><category>time machine</category><category>TimeMachine</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 20:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CERN creates a new super-fast internet, invites tons of people to a deathmatch]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/07/cern-creates-a-new-super-fast-internet-invites-tons-of-people-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/07/cern-creates-a-new-super-fast-internet-invites-tons-of-people-t/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/07/cern-creates-a-new-super-fast-internet-invites-tons-of-people-t/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><div align="center"><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article3689881.ece"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/04/cern1.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Apparently, when CERN isn't colliding particles (and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/28/us-lawsuit-calls-large-hadron-collider-a-doomsday-machine-higgs/">ripping massive holes</a> in the space-time continuum), it's busy working on a new "internet" which will be 10,000 times faster than our current version. The project -- known as "the grid" -- is built atop completely fiber optic networks, and utilizes modern routing centers. By keeping traffic out of our current phone and data systems, the researchers have been able to achieve speeds heretofore unseen on previous networks. The system connects from CERN to 11 centers around the globe, and will be switched on when the Large Hadron Collider is activated, on what the group is calling "Red Button Day." Project heads believe a network with this speed will lead to all sorts of futuristic innovations -- like true cloud computing, holographic video conferencing, and really, <em>really</em> fast pirating of the entire <em>Nightmare on Elm Street</em> series.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article3689881.ece>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/07/cern-creates-a-new-super-fast-internet-invites-tons-of-people-t/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1160423/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/07/cern-creates-a-new-super-fast-internet-invites-tons-of-people-t/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cern</category><category>fiber optic</category><category>FiberOptic</category><category>internet 2</category><category>Internet2</category><category>large hadron collider</category><category>LargeHadronCollider</category><category>new internet</category><category>NewInternet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Topolsky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 10:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Indonesian mosques to get superfast broadband at discount prices]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/06/malaysian-mosques-to-get-superfast-broadband-at-discount-prices/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/06/malaysian-mosques-to-get-superfast-broadband-at-discount-prices/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/06/malaysian-mosques-to-get-superfast-broadband-at-discount-prices/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><div align="center"><a href="http://computerworld.com.my/ShowPage.aspx?pagetype=2&amp;articleid=7942&amp;pubid=4&amp;issueid=131"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/04/indonesian_flag_1.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Think you're getting a decent speed for a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/atandt-surreptitiously-adds-10-dsl-plan/">decent price</a> on your broadband? Well <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/13/mans-quest-for-10-atandt-dsl-ends-in-success-kind-of/">think again</a>. Kuala Lumpur-based Velchip has just announced plans to create a vast broadband-over-powerline network which will deliver 224Mbps to users in Indonesia for about RM5 (or $1.57) per month. The goal is to connect Mosques across the country, linking together 400,000 houses of worship over existing wiring and delivering service to about 60 million users. The $14 billion project will be rolled out over the next three years, with participation from US satellite company STM Networks. It all makes that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/03/and-were-off-twin-cities-get-first-docsis-3-0-deployment/">$149.95 DOCSIS 3.0 introduction</a> look pretty weak, now doesn't it?<br /><br /><strong>Update:</strong> There was a bit of a mixup over whether this service was coming to Malaysia or Indonesia -- we've corrected the problem.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/04/06/0610201&amp;from=rss">Slashdot</a>]<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://computerworld.com.my/ShowPage.aspx?pagetype=2&amp;articleid=7942&amp;pubid=4&amp;issueid=131>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/06/malaysian-mosques-to-get-superfast-broadband-at-discount-prices/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1159853/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/06/malaysian-mosques-to-get-superfast-broadband-at-discount-prices/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>broadband</category><category>broadband over power lines</category><category>BroadbandOverPowerLines</category><category>kuala lumpur</category><category>KualaLumpur</category><category>malasia</category><category>stm networks</category><category>StmNetworks</category><category>Velchip</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Topolsky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 15:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[And we're off: Twin Cities get first DOCSIS 3.0 deployment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/03/and-were-off-twin-cities-get-first-docsis-3-0-deployment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/03/and-were-off-twin-cities-get-first-docsis-3-0-deployment/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/03/and-were-off-twin-cities-get-first-docsis-3-0-deployment/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><div align="center"><a href="http://www.comcastmn.com/press-release/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.engadgethd.com/media/2008/04/7-12-07-fast_internet.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /> </div>
Although we <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/05/comcast-upgrading-infrastructure-in-south-florida-more-hd-on-th/">just heard</a> that Comcast's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/08/cablelabs-drafts-docsis-3-0-specs/">DOCSIS 3.0</a> rollout was on track for 2009, folks in the Twin Cities region now have exclusive bragging rights for an undisclosed window of time. Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota have become the first markets to have access to an all new "extreme" broadband (or <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/09/comcast-shows-off-blisteringly-fast-channel-bonding-modem/">wideband</a>, as it were) connection, which promises 50Mbps down / 5Mbps up. As expected, the carrier isn't being modest about the launch, claiming that users can suck down a 4GB HD movie "in about ten minutes," compared to "more than six hours" on a 1.5Mbps DSL connection. The newfound speed won't come cheap -- for residential users, look to lay down $149.95 per month for the privilege. Even if you aren't springing for the good stuff, current customers in the area will have their existing broadband connections hastened gratis, with 6Mbps / 384Kbps users moving up to 1Mbps uploads and 8Mbps / 768Kbps users seeing 2Mbps uploads. Kudos, Twin Cities -- you just made most of America sick with envy.<br /> <br /> [Image courtesy of <a href="http://www.theredwoodmotel.com/images/internet.jpg">TheRedWoodMotel</a>]<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/03/and-were-off-twin-cities-get-first-docsis-3-0-deployment/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1156757/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/03/and-were-off-twin-cities-get-first-docsis-3-0-deployment/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>breaking news</category><category>BreakingNews</category><category>broadband</category><category>channel bonding</category><category>ChannelBonding</category><category>comcast</category><category>docsis 3.0</category><category>Docsis3.0</category><category>extreme internet</category><category>ExtremeInternet</category><category>internet</category><category>Minneapolis</category><category>minnesota</category><category>twin cities</category><category>TwinCities</category><category>wideband</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 07:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Swede used 40Gbps internet connection to dry laundry]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/31/swede-used-40gbps-internet-connection-to-dry-laundry/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/31/swede-used-40gbps-internet-connection-to-dry-laundry/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/31/swede-used-40gbps-internet-connection-to-dry-laundry/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><div align="center"><a href="http://www.thelocal.se/10810.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/03/7-12-07-fast_internet.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Chances are, you could think of a million and one ways to totally take advantage of having a 40Gbps internet connection installed in your abode, but for one Sigbritt L&ouml;thberg -- who actually <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/13/40gbps-internet-connection-installed-in-swedes-home/">had such a setup</a> -- she chose to take advantage of it in quite a perplexing way. Reportedly, the 75-year old dame wasn't too interested in downloading an entire HD film in two seconds or having ping times more minuscule than the brain can fathom; rather, she chose to use the excess heat emitted from all the kit shoved in her house to "dry her laundry." Unfortunately, the poor lady has had the gear removed from her domicile for further testing in another location, but according to Hafsteinn Jonsson, who is heading up the fiber network operation for Karlstad Stadsn&auml;t, they're considering "giving her a 100Gbps [link] in the summer -- then she'll be able to dry all her neighbors' laundry too."<br /><br />[Image courtesy of <a href="http://www.theredwoodmotel.com/images/internet.jpg">TheRedWoodMotel</a>]<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thelocal.se/10810.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/31/swede-used-40gbps-internet-connection-to-dry-laundry/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1153329/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/31/swede-used-40gbps-internet-connection-to-dry-laundry/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>40gbps</category><category>broadband</category><category>comedy</category><category>connection</category><category>fast internet</category><category>FastInternet</category><category>funny</category><category>internet</category><category>Karlstad</category><category>laundrty</category><category>speed</category><category>sweden</category><category>world record</category><category>world's fastest</category><category>World'sFastest</category><category>WorldRecord</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 08:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comcast backs off BitTorrent, will continue to manage internet traffic]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/comcast-lays-off-bittorrent-will-continue-to-manage-internet-tr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/comcast-lays-off-bittorrent-will-continue-to-manage-internet-tr/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/comcast-lays-off-bittorrent-will-continue-to-manage-internet-tr/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><div align="center"><a href="http://www.philly.com/philly/business/homepage/20080327_Comcast_agreement_in_dispute_with_BitTorrent.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/03/3-27-08-comcast_hearts_bt.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Although Comcast has been <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/19/comcast-engaging-in-data-discrimination/">beating around</a> the proverbial bush about its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/24/comcast-fesses-up-to-traffic-delays/">data-meddling ways</a>, it seems the pressure from the recent <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/09/fcc-to-investigate-comcast-bittorrent-filtering/">FCC investigation efforts</a> have forced it to play nice. Reportedly, the firm is getting set to (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/02/eff-claims-that-comcast-is-still-meddling-with-data/">begrudgingly</a>, we presume) announce that it will "stop targeting BitTorrent on the internet." More specifically, the cable company will purportedly "boost broadband capacity" in order to make things speedier all around, but details on this tidbit were unsurprisingly absent. Nevertheless, BitTorrent has also agreed to make its software "more efficient," but those hoping that Comcast would leave well enough alone are in for even more disappointment. The outfit still plans on managing traffic on the 'net (standard practice, we know), but Tony Werner, executive VP and CTO, noted that it was "working hard on a different approach that is protocol-agnostic during peak periods."<br /><br />[Thanks, Mike and <a href="http://www.virtica.net/">Kenneth</a>]<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.philly.com/philly/business/homepage/20080327_Comcast_agreement_in_dispute_with_BitTorrent.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/comcast-lays-off-bittorrent-will-continue-to-manage-internet-tr/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1150526/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/comcast-lays-off-bittorrent-will-continue-to-manage-internet-tr/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BitTorrent</category><category>blocking</category><category>comcast</category><category>data discrimination</category><category>DataDiscrimination</category><category>EFF</category><category>Electronic Frontier Foundation</category><category>ElectronicFrontierFoundation</category><category>fcc</category><category>internet</category><category>net neutrality</category><category>NetNeutrality</category><category>p2p</category><category>packet forgery</category><category>piracy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NTT DoCoMo hopes to diagnose disease, predict other misfortunes from cellphones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/ntt-docomo-hopes-to-diagnose-disease-predict-other-misfortunes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/ntt-docomo-hopes-to-diagnose-disease-predict-other-misfortunes/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/ntt-docomo-hopes-to-diagnose-disease-predict-other-misfortunes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><div align="center"><a href="http://www.nttdocomo.com/pr/2008/001391.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/03/zoltar-ntt-docomo-fortune.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
We like to think that NTT, Japan's dominant telephone company, is a serious corporation. So when NTT DoCoMo issues a press release claiming to have successfully demonstrated the world's first "molecular delivery system for molecular communication," we figure this must be significant. The technology and biochemistry at the foundation sure seems to be. In an experiment, NTT DoCoMo confirmed the use of synthesized DNA to transport specific molecules through the body. The process converts chemical energy into mechanical work so there's no need for an external power supply or control mechanism. The hope then is to one day plant a "biochip" in a cellphone which can read "excitement, emotion, stress or disease" from the simmering juices (blood, sweat and tears) pooled inside the meatsicles of "living organisms." This is where things start to fall apart. Seeing as how this is Japan, that ambiguous target audience means you <em>and</em> your <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=japan%20pet">pets</a>. Robots too, just as soon as they <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/20/skin-it-does-a-robot-good/">get skin</a>. And when the English press release claims that a bio-chipped phone could be applicable to "fortune telling" -- well, we've <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/06/solidalliances-omellete-mouse-cover-thats-rice-not-maggots/">lost</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/31/faster-yume-neko-smile-cat-kill-kill/">all</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/pet-stress-patch-clues-you-in-on-fidos-emotional-health/">hope</a>.<br /><br />[Thanks, StopSpamming]<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nttdocomo.com/pr/2008/001391.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/ntt-docomo-hopes-to-diagnose-disease-predict-other-misfortunes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1150435/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/ntt-docomo-hopes-to-diagnose-disease-predict-other-misfortunes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>biochip</category><category>dna</category><category>intrabody</category><category>intrabody communication</category><category>IntrabodyCommunication</category><category>molecular</category><category>molecular communication</category><category>MolecularCommunication</category><category>ntt docomo</category><category>NttDocomo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:17:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Motorola splits in two: Mobile Devices, and Broadband and Mobility Solutions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/26/motorola-splits-in-two-mobile-devices-and-broadband-and-mobilit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/26/motorola-splits-in-two-mobile-devices-and-broadband-and-mobilit/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/26/motorola-splits-in-two-mobile-devices-and-broadband-and-mobilit/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/36tyf9"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/media/2008/03/unhappy-moto.jpg" alt="" /></a>The board of directors has agreed to split Motorola into two independent, publicly-traded companies. The new entities will be called Mobile Devices and Broadband &amp; Mobility Solutions. The Mobile Devices business will focus on the design, manufacturing, and sales of mobile handsets and accessories globally. The Broadband &amp; Mobility Solutions business covers Moto's enterprise, government, public safety, and home and networks business. Greg Brown, Motorola's president and CEO, says the reason for the split is easy, "Creating two industry-leading companies will provide improved flexibility, more tailored capital structures, and increased management focus - as well as more targeted investment opportunities for our shareholders." Right, weren't those the reasons for the Palm split? The matter is of course subject to regulatory approvals, but Motorola hopes that the transaction is complete "in 2009."<br /><br />P.S. We're not sure whether this is a sad or happy Moto logo day. Regardless, we went with sad until we see <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/31/motorola-officially-considering-dropping-its-phone-unit/">signs of a turnaround</a>.<br /><br />[Thanks, Matt E.]<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://tinyurl.com/36tyf9>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/26/motorola-splits-in-two-mobile-devices-and-broadband-and-mobilit/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1149403/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/26/motorola-splits-in-two-mobile-devices-and-broadband-and-mobilit/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>breaking news</category><category>BreakingNews</category><category>greg brown</category><category>GregBrown</category><category>motorola</category><category>split</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 07:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[FCC redefines "broadband" to mean 768Kbps, "fast" to mean "kinda slow"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/fcc-redefines-broadband-to-mean-768kbps-fast-to-mean-kinda/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/fcc-redefines-broadband-to-mean-768kbps-fast-to-mean-kinda/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/fcc-redefines-broadband-to-mean-768kbps-fast-to-mean-kinda/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><a href="http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9898118-7.html"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/03/3-19-08-broadband.jpg"  alt="" /></a>Quick, how fast is "broadband?" If you're wearing a gray suit and drove a sensible car to work this morning in Washington DC, you probably answered 200Kbps -- a pokey little number that the FCC's been using as a baseline for years now. But even bureaucrats have to get with the times every now and again, and regulators this morning voted to push the government's official broadband threshold to 768Kbps -- we'd say it should really be a full 1Mbps, but why make things simple when you can be the government? Between 768kbps and 1.5Mbps is now classified as "basic broadband," and providers are also required to break down both upload and download speeds in specific increments -- a move which should make it harder for companies like Comcast to throttle certain types of connections. ISPs also have to provide subscriber numbers broken down by census-block level, which should provide graduate students with hours of number-crunching dissertation fun in the future. The goal is to make sure the data regarding broadband adoption in the US is as accurate as possible -- it's time to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/29/us-dethroned-as-tech-superpower-hint-not-by-s-korea/">reclaim the crown</a>, people.<br /> <h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9898118-7.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/fcc-redefines-broadband-to-mean-768kbps-fast-to-mean-kinda/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1144577/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/19/fcc-redefines-broadband-to-mean-768kbps-fast-to-mean-kinda/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>broadband</category><category>broadband adoption</category><category>BroadbandAdoption</category><category>fcc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rumor has it 802.11n Airport Express due out soon]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/16/rumor-has-it-802-11n-airport-express-due-out-soon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/16/rumor-has-it-802-11n-airport-express-due-out-soon/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/16/rumor-has-it-802-11n-airport-express-due-out-soon/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/wireless/" rel="tag">Wireless</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2008/03/15/new-airport-express-with-802-11n-next-week/"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/03/airport-express-n-me.jpg" /></a>MacRumors is reporting that a long overdue 802.11n version of the Airport Express should be landing soon, possibly as early as this Tuesday. Apparently it'll run for the same $99, so keep an eye out for Apple Store downtime in a couple days.<br /><br /><strong>Update:</strong> TUAW's reporting the 802.11n Express also <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2008/03/15/swiss-apple-store-page-tips-the-802-11n-airport-express/">appeared on the Swiss Apple site</a>, lending credence to the theory.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.macrumors.com/2008/03/15/new-airport-express-with-802-11n-next-week/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/16/rumor-has-it-802-11n-airport-express-due-out-soon/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1141384/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/16/rumor-has-it-802-11n-airport-express-due-out-soon/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Block]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 13:43:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Verizon aims to deploy 100G network capabilities in 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/10/verizon-aims-to-deploy-100g-network-capabilities-in-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/10/verizon-aims-to-deploy-100g-network-capabilities-in-2009/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/10/verizon-aims-to-deploy-100g-network-capabilities-in-2009/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/143294/verizon_to_move_to_100gbps_network_in_09.html"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/03/3-10-08-broadband.jpg"  alt="" /></a>If you'll recall, the IEEE gave the all important <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/06/ieee-votes-100g-as-the-next-ethernet-speed-scheduled-for-2010/">thumbs up</a> to 100G as the next Ethernet speed, and while we've seen such a milestone met on the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/internet2-prepped-for-100gbps-capacity/">Internet2</a>, Verizon's looking to bring it to the masses in just twelve short months. According to Fred Briggs, Verizon Business' executive vice president of operations and technology, the firm is aiming to "deploy 100G network capabilities over all its major routes within the United States." Verizon actually tested out its 100Gbps capabilities last year on a video transmission from Tampa to Miami, Florida, and apparently, the results "showed that it could deploy 100G on routes and not disrupt current wavelengths." Granted, we wouldn't expect many consumers to actually be able to take advantage of all this speed right away, but even if you're not down with (or nearby) any of Verizon's forthcoming offerings, there's always <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/08/07/cablelabs-specs-docsis-3-0-ipv6-160mbps-internet-and-more-hdtv/">DOCSIS 3.0</a>.<br /><br />[Image courtesy of <a href="http://mos.futurenet.com/classifications/computing/internet-and-broadband/images/broadband-exchange-289-75.jpg">Futurenet</a>]<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/143294/verizon_to_move_to_100gbps_network_in_09.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/10/verizon-aims-to-deploy-100g-network-capabilities-in-2009/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1136688/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/10/verizon-aims-to-deploy-100g-network-capabilities-in-2009/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>100g</category><category>100gbps</category><category>broadband</category><category>internet</category><category>speed</category><category>speeds</category><category>verizon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:56:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[IOGEAR's PCPortal remote desktop KVM is a little less virtual]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/10/iogears-pcportal-remote-desktop-kvm-is-a-little-less-virtual/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/10/iogears-pcportal-remote-desktop-kvm-is-a-little-less-virtual/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/10/iogears-pcportal-remote-desktop-kvm-is-a-little-less-virtual/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><div align="center"><a href="http://www.iogear.com/product/GCN1000/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/03/iogear-pcportal-1.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Remote desktop clients are great for those one-in-a-million scenarios when your computer is working well enough to connect to the internet and run a remote desktop app, but still requires technical assistance. In contrast, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/IOGEAR/">IOGEAR</a> gives IT types full control from boot with the spendy-but-useful PCPortal GCN1000. The internet-connected <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/KVM/">KVM</a> switch is completely hardware-based, meaning the computer you're controlling needs no working operating system to be taken control of, and IT people have about as much control over the remote PC as they would if sitting directly in front of it. You can also plug the GCN1000 into regular KVM switches to manage multiple computers remotely, as well as use the Virtual Media port to give remote users data straight from whatever's plugged into the USB port. Unfortunately, all this hotness comes at a cost: the GCN1000 is available now for $500.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://blastmagazine.com/2008/03/iogear-launches-pcportal/">Blast</a>]<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.iogear.com/product/GCN1000/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/10/iogears-pcportal-remote-desktop-kvm-is-a-little-less-virtual/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1136500/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/10/iogears-pcportal-remote-desktop-kvm-is-a-little-less-virtual/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>gcn1000</category><category>iogear</category><category>kvm</category><category>pcporta</category><category>remote desktop</category><category>RemoteDesktop</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:27:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[En-Twyn's En-Compass incorporates Powerline into socket]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/08/en-twyns-en-compass-incorporates-powerline-into-socket/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/08/en-twyns-en-compass-incorporates-powerline-into-socket/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/08/en-twyns-en-compass-incorporates-powerline-into-socket/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><div align="center"><a href="http://digital-lifestyles.info/2008/03/06/en-twyn-powerline-in-a-power-socket/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/03/3-8-08-en-twyn-lg1.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
CeBIT and Powerline seem to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/17/cebit-showcases-looming-trend-tv-through-the-ac-outlet/">have a thing</a> for one another, and sure enough, this year we're seeing yet another firm storm onto the scene in an attempt to advance the flagging technology. London-based En-Twyn set up shop in Germany to showcase its En-Compass, which doesn't require any special wall cutouts and differs from most other Powerline systems by packing its electronics on the backside. In other words, you won't have any unsightly adapters protruding from the front. Beyond that, everything else works as expected -- Ethernet signals travel over your existing home wiring setup -- but unfortunately, the product is still stuck in prototype stage at the moment.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://digital-lifestyles.info/2008/03/06/en-twyn-powerline-in-a-power-socket/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/08/en-twyns-en-compass-incorporates-powerline-into-socket/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1135120/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/08/en-twyns-en-compass-incorporates-powerline-into-socket/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>broadband</category><category>cat5</category><category>cebit</category><category>cebit 2008</category><category>Cebit2008</category><category>En-Compass</category><category>En-Twyn</category><category>ethernet</category><category>internet</category><category>power-over-ethernet</category><category>powerline</category><category>socket</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Ripserver may make your CD collection history]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/the-ripserver-may-make-your-cd-collection-history/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/the-ripserver-may-make-your-cd-collection-history/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/the-ripserver-may-make-your-cd-collection-history/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/storage/" rel="tag">Storage</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><div align="center"><a href="http://www.ripfactory.com/ripserver.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/03/gi_psilewhiteml.bmp.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Gigantic, festering CD collection got you down? Need some solution to get all of that music onto a hard drive, but simply don't have the patience or skill to use iTunes and an external hard drive? Well you're in luck, because the Ripserver is here. Acting as a completely stand-alone solution, this handsome black or white box lets you rip and store your music without any additional hardware or software. The RAID 1 device comes in 500GB or 1TB configurations, rips as FLAC files or MP3s (with adjustable bit rates), functions as a NAS device with UPnP support, supports connectivity with additional USB drives, and is DNLA compliant. The Ripserver runs a Linux build atop an Epia 1GHZ CPU, with 512MB of RAM, and boasts VGA, USB, and PS2 ports. The 500GB will run you &pound;599 (or around $1,189), and the 1TB &pound;699 ($1,388) -- both are shipping now.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ripfactory.com/ripserver.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/the-ripserver-may-make-your-cd-collection-history/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1131667/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/the-ripserver-may-make-your-cd-collection-history/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cd ripping</category><category>CdRipping</category><category>music server</category><category>MusicServer</category><category>nas</category><category>ripfactory</category><category>ripserver</category><category>server</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Topolsky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 07:43:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Acer ups the Altos easyStore SOHO NAS to 3TB]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/03/acer-ups-the-alto-easystore-soho-nas-to-3tb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/03/acer-ups-the-alto-easystore-soho-nas-to-3tb/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/03/acer-ups-the-alto-easystore-soho-nas-to-3tb/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/storage/" rel="tag">Storage</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><div align="center"><a href="http://www.ehomeupgrade.com/2008/03/03/acer-altos-easystore/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/03/3-3-08-easystore.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Acer's been pretty low-key with its SOHO-targeted Altos easyStore <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/nas">NAS</a> offerings, but it's not just letting it wither away either, upping the capacity today to a max of 3TB. The black four-drive tower features a web interface to disk options like RAID levels and automatic backup schedules, and Acer bundles in a bootable CD that allows you to restore from catastrophic system failures. It's not clear when the 3TB easyStore is going to make it out, but the 2TB version has been available for large discounts and garnering decent reviews since August, so you may want to start poking around if you're looking to jump aboard the NAS train.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ehomeupgrade.com/2008/03/03/acer-altos-easystore/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/03/acer-ups-the-alto-easystore-soho-nas-to-3tb/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1130445/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/03/acer-ups-the-alto-easystore-soho-nas-to-3tb/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>acer</category><category>altos</category><category>altos easystore</category><category>AltosEasystore</category><category>easystore</category><category>nas</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 19:23:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[D-Link launches Quadband DIR-855 Wireless N Router]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/03/d-link-launches-quadband-dir-855-wireless-n-router/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/03/d-link-launches-quadband-dir-855-wireless-n-router/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/03/d-link-launches-quadband-dir-855-wireless-n-router/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><div align="center"><a href="http://www.prlog.org/10054384-link-launches-powerful-quadband-dir-855-wireless-router.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/03/3-3-08-dir-855.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Perpetual HD media streaming and online deathmatches got your current router in a bind? D-Link's looking to solve said quandary by introducing the Quadband DIR-855 Wireless N Router, which quite simply "supports true concurrent 802.11n transmission over both 2.4GHz and 5GHz channels at the same time." Granted, you'll need a wireless chipset capable of detecting both 2.4GHz and 5GHz channels or either the company's own DWA-160 USB adapter to take advantage, but we suppose that's the price you pay for being able to "segregate your network by application." You'll also find 5 gigabit Ethernet ports for those times when only wires will suffice, and the OLED display up top keeps things flashy, too. Expect this one to land in May for a stiff &pound;169.99 ($337).<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.trustedreviews.com/networking/news/2008/03/03/D-Link-Launches-Dual-Channel-Wireless-N-Router/p1">TrustedReviews</a>]<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.prlog.org/10054384-link-launches-powerful-quadband-dir-855-wireless-router.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/03/d-link-launches-quadband-dir-855-wireless-n-router/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1130069/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/03/d-link-launches-quadband-dir-855-wireless-n-router/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>802.11n</category><category>d-link</category><category>DIR-855</category><category>draft-n</category><category>quad band</category><category>quad-band</category><category>QuadBand</category><category>router</category><category>wireless n</category><category>WirelessN</category><category>wlan</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 13:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[IBM's "green optical link" promises one second movie downloads]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/01/ibms-green-optical-link-promises-one-second-movie-downloads/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/01/ibms-green-optical-link-promises-one-second-movie-downloads/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/01/ibms-green-optical-link-promises-one-second-movie-downloads/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><div align="center"><a href="http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/23607.wss"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/03/green-lasers-dude.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
So IBM is apparently working like crazy on some next-gen communications technology that -- ready to have your mind blown? -- "uses light instead of wires to send information." We know, this is some crazy future crap up in here, but check it out. Apparently this so-called light-based communications system is supposed to be ten times more power efficient than others in its class, and can transfer data at speeds far greater than our current 4Mbps token-ring networks and even the next-gen 10BASE2 Ethernet (as if!); if optical data communications are actually real, well, it's just in time because we've been seriously maxing out our Tandy 1000 playing MUDs. Touting such other gibberish as "high definition content," and "ex-aflop supercomputing," IBM's Optocards (which feature integrated "Optochips") can apparently move data at up to 8Tbps / 1TBps, which isn't quite up to snuff to compete with <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/">Alcatel-Lucent's latest</a>, but is still, like, way more than necessary for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2005/08/22/engadget-1985/">accessing the Engadget BBS</a>.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/23607.wss>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/01/ibms-green-optical-link-promises-one-second-movie-downloads/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1128745/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/01/ibms-green-optical-link-promises-one-second-movie-downloads/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>fiber optics</category><category>FiberOptics</category><category>green optical link</category><category>GreenOpticalLink</category><category>ibm</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Block]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 05:41:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Alcatel-Lucent sends data 1600 miles at 16.4Tbps]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><a href="http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=206900603&amp;cid=RSSfeed_IWK_All"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/02/2-29-08-16tbps.jpg" alt="" /></a>Sure, the researchers at Alcatel-Lucent have already sent data <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/29/alcatel-lucent-blows-past-data-transmission-record-25-6tbps/">50 miles at 25.6Tbps</a>, but it looks like now they're going for distance rather than speed: the company announced yesterday that it's now pumped bits over a 1584-mile long link at 16.4Tbps. Sure, that's slightly slower than the record, but being able to firehose bits at distances like that is even more impressive, if you ask us (you didn't). The core tech is essentially the same as used in the earlier speed record: bundling several 100Gbps optical signals at different wavelengths into one multiplexed transmission, shooting it down fiber, and splitting it up at the end. This latest test used 164 different channels and updated transmitters and multiplexers to hit the record -- which is fine and all, but guys, if you're not using that old school 25.6Tbps gear anymore we know a few people who are interested.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/02/28/1332224&amp;from=rss">Slashdot</a>]<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=206900603&amp;cid=RSSfeed_IWK_All>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1128128/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/29/alcatel-lucent-send-data-1600-miles-at-16-4tbps/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alcatel</category><category>alcatel lucent</category><category>AlcatelLucent</category><category>data transmision</category><category>DataTransmision</category><category>lucent</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:37:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Capsule shipping this week?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/28/time-capsule-shipping-this-week/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/28/time-capsule-shipping-this-week/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/28/time-capsule-shipping-this-week/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/wireless/" rel="tag">Wireless</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/storage/" rel="tag">Storage</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><div align="center"><a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/02/27/time_capsule_to_ship_new_wireless_bill_macbook_pro_benchmarks.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadgetmobile.com/media/2008/01/1-21-08timecapsulefront.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
According to AppleInsider, it sounds like <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/15/apple-introduces-time-capsule/">Time Capsule</a> customers' orders are in the crucial "preparing to ship" phase about now, meaning credit cards are being charged and units will be loaded onto trucks for distribution as early as tomorrow for some. Apple still hasn't said anything officially about shipping though; just don't be too surprised units start showing up shortly at your doorstep or in your local Apple store.<br /><br /><strong>Update:</strong> Yep, we've got confirmation from Apple that it's shipping this week (although some users apparently already manage to snag theirs offline -- good for you). The only question now is: will it really last 10,000 years if buried in your back yard?<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/02/27/time_capsule_to_ship_new_wireless_bill_macbook_pro_benchmarks.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/28/time-capsule-shipping-this-week/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1126673/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/28/time-capsule-shipping-this-week/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>release</category><category>shipping</category><category>time capsule</category><category>TimeCapsule</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Block]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 05:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Japan launches Kizuna satellite, hopes it will deliver high-speed internet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/23/japan-launches-kizuna-satellite-hopes-it-will-deliver-high-spee/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/23/japan-launches-kizuna-satellite-hopes-it-will-deliver-high-spee/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/23/japan-launches-kizuna-satellite-hopes-it-will-deliver-high-spee/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><div align="center"><a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jP7tVPTO6h6vWSsCPkt44aex2H_wD8V01UMO0"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/02/2-23-08-kizuna.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Granted, most of us here in America would turn our noses up at receiving in-home broadband via satellite -- after all, cable and DSL seem to be treating most of us quite alright -- but Japan is hoping to provide access to more regions in Asia-Pacific with its recently launched Kizuna. The experimental satellite is not yet intended for commercial use, but if all goes well, it will enable data transmissions "of up to 1.2 gigabytes per second" at a low cost across Japan and 19 other locales in Southeast Asia. Unfortunately, we've no idea when it will escape the bondage of testing and actually be put to good use, but at least Japan's well on its way to actually establishing that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/15/japan-looking-to-establish-wireless-island/">wireless island</a>, eh?<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/02/23/japan.satellite/index.html?eref=rss_topstories">CNN</a>, thanks to everyone who sent this in]<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jP7tVPTO6h6vWSsCPkt44aex2H_wD8V01UMO0>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/23/japan-launches-kizuna-satellite-hopes-it-will-deliver-high-spee/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1122865/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/23/japan-launches-kizuna-satellite-hopes-it-will-deliver-high-spee/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>broadband</category><category>internet</category><category>internet satellite</category><category>InternetSatellite</category><category>japan</category><category>JAXA</category><category>Kizuna</category><category>launch</category><category>Mitsubishi</category><category>rocket</category><category>satellite</category><category>WINDS</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[San Francisco bus getting WiFi, deathmatch to follow]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/21/san-francisco-bus-getting-wifi-deathmatch-to-follow/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/21/san-francisco-bus-getting-wifi-deathmatch-to-follow/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/21/san-francisco-bus-getting-wifi-deathmatch-to-follow/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/transportation/" rel="tag">Transportation</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><div align="center"><a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/02/21/BA0LV60MP.DTL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/02/bus.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Finally things are starting to get a little more futuristic around here. Beginning next Monday, bus riders in San Francisco will get a chance to hop at least one ride that will take them to the Columbus stop, Van Ness stop... and the World of Tomorrow. Thanks to the combined effort of SF's Muni and Cisco, the "Connected Bus" will be hauling around free WiFi and touchscreen maps on its walls (which will also carry updated connecting transit information). Sure, it's no <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/meraki-promises-free-citywide-wifi-network-for-san-francisco/">citywide wireless coverage</a>, but combined with the BART train <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/02/wifi-trial-comes-to-san-franciscos-bart-trains/">WiFi rollout</a>, it's certainly a start. Cisco tested the bus with 15 riders checking email and downloading music and movies on laptops, and say that the signal was "strong and uninterrupted," though they admit they haven't tested the system during a 15-player fragfest. Anyone up for a ride?<br /><br />[Thanks, Paul in SF]<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/02/21/BA0LV60MP.DTL>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/21/san-francisco-bus-getting-wifi-deathmatch-to-follow/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1121108/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/21/san-francisco-bus-getting-wifi-deathmatch-to-follow/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bus</category><category>muni</category><category>san francisco</category><category>SanFrancisco</category><category>sf</category><category>wifi</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Topolsky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Duke University: home to world's largest 802.11n wireless network]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/19/duke-university-home-to-worlds-largest-802-11n-wireless-networ/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/19/duke-university-home-to-worlds-largest-802-11n-wireless-networ/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/19/duke-university-home-to-worlds-largest-802-11n-wireless-networ/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/wireless/" rel="tag">Wireless</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><div align="center"><a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/080219/0363235.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/02/2-19-08-duke-campus.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
We know, most of you Blue Devil fans are still reeling from that recent loss to Wake Forest, but if it's any consolation, at least your campus is about to become home to the "world's largest" 802.11n wireless network. Last we heard, <em>The</em> Ohio State University <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/09/aruba-networks-to-install-worlds-largest-wlan-at-osu/">held the crown</a> for Earth's biggest WLAN with 1,700 access points lit, but according to Cisco, Duke's campus will soon house 2,500 Aironet 1250 Series APs. The installation will leave more than six million square feet of central North Carolina blanketed in WiFi, and will supposedly be the "largest planned 802.11n wireless network in the world by any organization to date." Watch out, Dukies -- we hear those folks in Chapel Hill have a thing for swiping unsecured signals.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/080219/0363235.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/19/duke-university-home-to-worlds-largest-802-11n-wireless-networ/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1118712/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/19/duke-university-home-to-worlds-largest-802-11n-wireless-networ/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>802.11n</category><category>acc</category><category>cisco</category><category>duke</category><category>Duke University</category><category>DukeUniversity</category><category>internet</category><category>university</category><category>wifi</category><category>wireless</category><category>wlan</category><category>world record</category><category>WorldRecord</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[IBM plots global-scale shared computer to host entire internet as application]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/08/ibm-plots-global-scale-shared-computer-to-host-entire-internet-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/08/ibm-plots-global-scale-shared-computer-to-host-entire-internet-a/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/08/ibm-plots-global-scale-shared-computer-to-host-entire-internet-a/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><a href="http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1341312.1341326"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/06/6-26-07-bluegenep.jpg" alt="" /></a>Well, it sure looks like IBM is keeping all its supercomputing bases covered these days, with it not only working on a chip-sized supercomputer, but a global-scale shared computer that'd be capable of "hosting the entire internet as an application." That latter word comes in the form of a white paper ambitiously dubbed "Project Kittyhawk" (we're guessing they found "Project Mulitvac" a little too obvious), which aims to explore the construction and implications of such a massive scale computer. That apparently wouldn't be a SETI or <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/folding@home">Folding@home</a>-style shared computer consisting of everyday PCs, however, with it instead relying on IBM's petaflopping <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/26/ibm-unveils-one-petaflop-blue-gene-p-supercomputer/">Blue Gene/P</a> as a common platform, which would effectively be able to run any web-scale application you could throw at it. Of course, none of that has moved very far beyond the page just yet, so you can rest easy that there's still no supercomputer out there that's capable of bringing the entire internet to the halt on a whim, at least that we know of.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/02/07/0339245&amp;from=rss">Slashdot</a>]<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1341312.1341326>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/08/ibm-plots-global-scale-shared-computer-to-host-entire-internet-a/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1110234/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/08/ibm-plots-global-scale-shared-computer-to-host-entire-internet-a/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ibm</category><category>project kittyhawk</category><category>ProjectKittyhawk</category><category>shared computer</category><category>SharedComputer</category><category>supercomputer</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 11:59:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>